%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Type /Catalog
/Version /1.5
/Pages 2 0 R
/PageLabels 3 0 R
/Metadata 4 0 R
/Outlines 5 0 R
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Title (Digital Code and Literary Text)
/Author (Florian Cramer)
/Subject (Digital code as text. Can notions of text that were developed without electronic texts in mind be applied to digital code, and how does literature come into play here? My talk is based on the general \(yet disputable\) assumption that the theoretical debate of literature in digital networks has shifted, just as the poetic practices it is shaped after, from perceiving computer technology solely as an extension of conventional textuality \(as manifest in such notions as 'hypertext', 'hyperfiction', 'hyper-/ multimedia'\) towards paying attention to the very codedness of digital systems themselves. Several phenomena may serve as empirical evidence: - The early focus of conceptualist Net.art on the aesthetics and politics of code; - in turn, the impact of Net.art aesthetics on experimental literature / poetry in the Internet; - the close affinity of Net.art with political activism in the Internet; - which itself increasingly affiliates itself with an older, technical 'hacker' culture \(of Chaos Computer Club, 2600, etc.\); - the strong interest for \(a\) Free/Open Source Software and \(b\) network protocol standardization in all these camps; - the fact that hacker aesthetics, Net.art aesthetics, code aesthetics and network protocol aesthetics have a tremendous impact on contemporary writing in the Internet. \(See the work of mez, Alan Sondheim, Talan Memmott, Ted Warnell and others.\) I wll discuss how "Codeworks" \(Alan Sondheim\) fit notions of text that were crafted without digital code \(and most importantly: machine-executable digital code\) in mind and vice versa. Is it a coincidence for example that, reflecting the low-level codes of the Internet aesthetically, codeworks ended up resembling concrete poetry? And, apart from aesthetic resemblances, how do computer programs relate to literature? Is that what is currently being discussed as "Software Art" a literary genre? Since many of these positions remain debatable, I would like to put up questions in my presentation rather than give answers.)
/Keywords (digital literature,textuality,code)
/Producer (Apache FOP Version 2.1)
/CreationDate (D:20220104155514+01'00')
/Comments ()
/Company <5068696C697070732D556E69766572736974E474204D617262757267>
/Creator <4163726F626174205044464D616B65722031352066FC7220576F7264>
/ModDate (D:20211114154919+01'00')
/SourceModified (D:20211114144856)
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Type /Pages
/Kids [7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R]
/Count 9
>>
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/Nums [0 16 0 R]
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Length 3015
/Type /Metadata
/Subtype /XML
>>
stream
Digital code as text. Can notions of text that were developed without electronic texts in mind be applied to digital code, and how does literature come into play here? My talk is based on the general (yet disputable) assumption that the theoretical debate of literature in digital networks has shifted, just as the poetic practices it is shaped after, from perceiving computer technology solely as an extension of conventional textuality (as manifest in such notions as 'hypertext', 'hyperfiction', 'hyper-/ multimedia') towards paying attention to the very codedness of digital systems themselves. Several phenomena may serve as empirical evidence: - The early focus of conceptualist Net.art on the aesthetics and politics of code; - in turn, the impact of Net.art aesthetics on experimental literature / poetry in the Internet; - the close affinity of Net.art with political activism in the Internet; - which itself increasingly affiliates itself with an older, technical 'hacker' culture (of Chaos Computer Club, 2600, etc.); - the strong interest for (a) Free/Open Source Software and (b) network protocol standardization in all these camps; - the fact that hacker aesthetics, Net.art aesthetics, code aesthetics and network protocol aesthetics have a tremendous impact on contemporary writing in the Internet. (See the work of mez, Alan Sondheim, Talan Memmott, Ted Warnell and others.) I wll discuss how "Codeworks" (Alan Sondheim) fit notions of text that were crafted without digital code (and most importantly: machine-executable digital code) in mind and vice versa. Is it a coincidence for example that, reflecting the low-level codes of the Internet aesthetically, codeworks ended up resembling concrete poetry? And, apart from aesthetic resemblances, how do computer programs relate to literature? Is that what is currently being discussed as "Software Art" a literary genre? Since many of these positions remain debatable, I would like to put up questions in my presentation rather than give answers.
Florian Cramer
application/pdf
Digital Code and Literary Text
x-unknown
2022-01-04T15:55:14+01:00
digital literature,textuality,code
Apache FOP Version 2.1
1.4
2022-01-04T15:55:14+01:00
2022-01-04T15:55:14+01:00
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Count 8
/First 17 0 R
/Last 18 0 R
/Type /Outlines
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Resources 19 0 R
/Type /Page
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 595.275 841.889]
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.275 841.889]
/BleedBox [0 0 595.275 841.889]
/TrimBox [0 0 595.275 841.889]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Annots [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R]
/Contents 24 0 R
/Rotate 0
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Contents [25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R]
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 33 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 0
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Contents 34 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 35 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 1
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Contents 36 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 37 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 2
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Contents 38 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 39 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 3
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Contents 40 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 41 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 4
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Annots [42 0 R]
/Contents 43 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 44 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 5
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Contents 45 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 46 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 7
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Annots [47 0 R 48 0 R]
/Contents 49 0 R
/CropBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/MediaBox [0.0 0.0 419.52 595.32]
/Parent 2 0 R
/Resources 50 0 R
/Rotate 0
/StructParents 8
/Tabs /S
/Type /Page
>>
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/S /D
>>
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/A 51 0 R
/Next 52 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Title (Digital Code and Literary Text)
>>
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/A 53 0 R
/Parent 5 0 R
/Prev 54 0 R
/Title (Notes)
>>
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Font 55 0 R
/ProcSet [/PDF /ImageB /ImageC /Text]
/ColorSpace 56 0 R
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Type /Annot
/Subtype /Link
/Rect [59.527 727.606 321.551 740.948]
/C [0 0 0]
/Border [0 0 0]
/A 57 0 R
/H /I
>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Type /Annot
/Subtype /Link
/Rect [73.7 599.951 261.24 609.481]
/C [0 0 0]
/Border [0 0 0]
/A 58 0 R
/H /I
>>
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/Type /Annot
/Subtype /Link
/Rect [59.527 246.807 228.479 254.207]
/C [0 0 0]
/Border [0 0 0]
/A 59 0 R
/H /I
>>
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/Type /Annot
/Subtype /Link
/Rect [304.723 266.007 473.675 273.407]
/C [0 0 0]
/Border [0 0 0]
/A 59 0 R
/H /I
>>
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Length 90931
/Filter /FlateDecode
>>
stream
x[mɑ~~E=