2019/1 - Media Ethnography

Browsing 2019/1 - Media Ethnography by Subject "Familienleben"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Article
    Cooperation and Difference. Camera Ethnography in the Research Project ‘Early Childhood and Smartphone’
    Mohn, Bina E.; Hare, Pip; Vogelpohl, Astrid; Wiesemann, Jutta (2019) , S. 81-104
    The article examines the fundamental role of cooperation and difference in ethnographic research. We use camera ethnography in our research project B05 “Early Childhood and Smartphone. Family Interaction Order, Learning Processes and Cooperation” to reveal the iconographic aspects of media practices and to examine their choreographies in space and time. This enables us to engage with aspects such as embodiment, materiality, and perception in early childhood and learning. Rather than using video technology to produce recordings of a ‘reality’ assumed to be simply there and filmable, a key methodological premise of camera ethnography is that the visibility of an object of research is not given a priori but has to be generated by media ethnographic research practices. Hence, ethnographic research practices are epistemic practices and constitute “epistemic things” (see Rheinberger 2006; Knorr-Cetina 1999). To discover and investigate media practices in early childhood involves building, shaping, and maintaining relationships of cooperation and difference.
  • Article
    Ethnomethodological Media Ethnography: Exploring Everyday Digital Practices in Families with Young Children
    Eisenmann, Clemens; Peter, Jan; Wittbusch, Erik (2019) , S. 63-80
    New media have become an integral part of everyday life. In our research, we explore how media practices are employed in the mutual accomplishment of families and in the way young children grow up. This article considers the particularities of doing ethnography in this context: How can ethnographic research be conducted in a private setting and to what extent are family media practices related to practices of observing researchers? Revisiting our research process, we discuss challenges of establishing the field and maintaining relationships. Further, we focus on our media use in the field as well as briefly after fieldwork. We show how everyday family life involves ethnographers in various ways and how media practices in the field and in research interrelate and are cooperatively achieved. Rather than ignoring or correcting for these forms of involvement, our position is that they allow a better understanding of both everyday family life and media ethnography.