Article:
Distributed Authorship and Creative Communities

dc.creatorBiggs, Simon
dc.creatorTravlou, Penny
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T09:44:01Z
dc.date.available2022-01-07T09:44:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-30
dc.description.abstractIn its requirement, for both an author and reader, art can be considered a participatory activity. Expanded concepts of agency allow us to question what or who can be an active participant, allowing us to revisit the debate on authorship from alternate perspectives. We can ask whether creativity might be regarded as a form of social interaction, rather than an outcome. How might we understand creativity as interaction between people and things, as sets of discursive relations rather than outcomes? Whilst creativity is often perceived as the product of the individual artist, or creative ensemble, it can also be considered an emergent phenomenon of communities, driving change and facilitating individual or ensemble creativity. Creativity can be a performative activity released when engaged through and by a community and understood as a process of interaction. In this context the model of the solitary artist who produces artefacts which embody creativity is questioned as an ideal for achieving creative outcomes. Instead, creativity is proposed as an activity of exchange that enables (creates) people and communities. In his book Creative Land anthropologist James Leach describes cultural practices where the creation of new things, and the ritualised forms of exchange enacted around them, function to “create” individuals and bind them in social groups, “creating” the community they inhabit. Leach’s argument is an interesting take on the concept of the gift-economy and suggests it is possible to conceive of creativity as emergent from and innate to the interactions of people. Such an understanding might then function to combat an instrumentalist view of creativity that demands of artists that their creations have social (e.g.: “economic”) value. In the argument proposed here, creativity is not valued as arising from a perceived need, a particular solution or product, nor from a “blue skies” ideal, but as an emergent property of communities. This paper seeks to articulate these issues, identifying a set of core questions and describing the context within which they will be addressed, indicating how these questions are at the centre of the pan-European Electronic Literature as a Model ofen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/17743
dc.identifier.urihttps://mediarep.org/handle/doc/18710
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherRoberto Simanowski
dc.publisher.placeBasel
dc.relation.isPartOfissn:1617-6901
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDichtung Digital. Journal für Kunst und Kultur digitaler Medien
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
dc.subjectDigital Mediaen
dc.subjectcollaborative authorshipen
dc.subject.ddcddc:791
dc.titleDistributed Authorship and Creative Communitiesen
dc.typearticle
dc.type.statuspublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typeArticleen
local.coverpage2022-01-07T10:53:21
local.source.epage17
local.source.issue1
local.source.issueTitleNr. 41
local.source.spage1
local.source.volume14

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Dichtung-Digital_41_1-17_Biggs_Travlou_Distributed_Authorship_.pdf
Size:
283.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Original PDF with additional cover page.

Collections