Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech

Bonfadelli, Heinz

doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/24537

Review:
Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech

Author(s):

Bonfadelli, Heinz

Full item page

Bonfadelli, Heinz: Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech. In: MEDIENwissenschaft: Rezensionen | Reviews, Jg. 43 (2026), Nr. 1, S. 54-55.http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/24537

Keywords

Falschmeldung Fake News Desinformation Meinungsmache Redefreiheit

As long as there is no further specification, the item is under the following license: Creative Commons - Namensnennung

Review:
Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech

Reviewed Publication:

Reviewed Publication:

Published in:

Keywords

Review: Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech

Reviewed Publication:

Reviewed Publication:

Published in:

Keywords

Review:
Peter Cunliffe-Jones: Fake News – What’s the Harm? Four Ideas for Fact-Checkers, Policymakers and Platforms on Countering the Consequences of False Information and Defending Free Speech