Cuntz, Michael2022-06-212022-06-212014https://meiner.de/artikel/1000106409https://mediarep.org/handle/doc/19721The paper deals with different spatiotemporal relations within different collectives and the attitudes towards places and the ground arising from them. Drawing resources from Latour, Serres and ethnologists/anthropologists Viveiros de Castro and Descola, it follows up Haudricourt’s opposition between direct positive and indirect negative action towards domesticated species and the further consequences that might derive from these different modes of operation. It concludes with an outlook on affinities between the security-mode of power as described by Foucault and the Eastern distribution of agency as described by Haudricourt and Jullien.engRaumzeitlichkeitspatiotemporalityplace30010.28937/100010640910.25969/mediarep/185871869-1366