Article: Domestizierung im Vergleich
Abstract
Domestication can be defined by a nucleus of three technical activities: controlled reproduction and nutrition as well as protection of animals and plants from damage. If one applies this definition to a comparison of cultures and collectives, two surprises arise: Without being in touch of any kind of domestication, hunter-gatherers develop a ritual domestication or a mythological understanding that their world already is domesticated. And in modernity, possible naturalization arises at the side of technical domestication. The paper draws some conclusions from this typological comparison.
Preferred Citation
BibTex
Schüttpelz, Erhard: Domestizierung im Vergleich. In: ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, Jg. 7 (2016), Nr. 2, S. 93-109. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18657.
@ARTICLE{Schüttpelz2016,
author = {Schüttpelz, Erhard},
title = {Domestizierung im Vergleich},
year = 2016,
doi = "\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18657}",
volume = 7,
address = {Hamburg},
journal = {ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung},
number = 2,
pages = {93--109},
}
author = {Schüttpelz, Erhard},
title = {Domestizierung im Vergleich},
year = 2016,
doi = "\url{http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18657}",
volume = 7,
address = {Hamburg},
journal = {ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung},
number = 2,
pages = {93--109},
}
Keywords
As long as there is no further specification, the item is under the following license: Creative Commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen